PoliForum

A continuing conversation of politics and policy.

Contributors

Friday, January 4, 2008

A New Reformation (But Will it Work?)

by Brian


“People are looking for a Presidential Candidate who reminds them more of the guy they work with rather than the guy who just laid them off.” – Mike Huckabee on the Jay leno show Wednesday night.


Be not afraid. Some people are going to tell you that Mike Huckabee’s victory last night in Iowa represents a triumph for the creationist crusaders. Wrong.


Huckabee won because he tapped into realities that other Republicans have been slow to recognize. First, evangelicals have changed. Huckabee is the first ironic evangelical on the national stage. He’s funny, campy (see his Chuck Norris fixation) and he’s not at war (bold the word war) with modern culture.


Second, Huckabee understands much better than Mitt Romney that we have a crisis of authority in this country. People have lost faith in their leaders’ ability to respond to problems. While Romney embodies the leadership class, Huckabee went after it. He criticized Wall Street and K Street. Most importantly, he sensed that conservatives do not believe their own movement is well led. He took on Rush Limbaugh, the Club for Growth and even President Bush. The old guard threw everything they had at him, and their diminished power is now exposed.


Third, Huckabee understands how middle-class anxiety is really lived. Democrats talk about wages. But real middle-class families have more to fear economically from divorce than from a free trade pact. A person’s lifetime prospects will be threatened more by single parenting than by outsourcing. Huckabee understands that economic well-being is fused with social and moral well-being, and he talks about the inter-relationship in a way no other candidate has.

In that sense, Huckabee’s victory is not a step into the past. It opens up the way for a new coalition.


Don’t get me wrong, Evangelicals won Iowa for Huckabee. They still feel culture is the problem. The thing really pushing his supporters, is that they believe that what ails America and threatens its continued existence is not economic collapse or jihad, it is our culture.

They have been bruised and offended by the rigid, almost militant secularism and multiculturalism of the public schools; they reject those schools' squalor, in all senses of the word. They believe in God and family and America. They are populist: They don't admire billionaire CEOs, they admire husbands with two jobs who hold the family together for the sake of the kids; they don't need to see the triumph of supply-side thinking, they want to see that suffering woman down the street get the help she needs.


They believe that Mr. Huckabee, the minister who speaks their language, shares, down to the bone, their anxieties, concerns and beliefs. They fear that the other Republican candidates are caught up in a million smaller issues--taxing, spending, the global economy, Sunnis and Shia--and missing the central issue: again, our culture. They are populists who vote Republican.

A conservatism that recognizes stable families as the foundation of economic growth is not hard to imagine. A conservatism that loves capitalism but distrusts capitalists is not hard to imagine either. Adam Smith felt this way. A conservatism that pays attention to people making less than $50,000 a year is the only conservatism worth defending.


Will Huckabee move on and lead this new conservatism? Highly doubtful. The past few weeks have exposed his serious flaws as a presidential candidate. His foreign policy knowledge is minimal. His lapses into amateurishness simply won’t fly in a national campaign. The presidency, as an office, can actually make real changes in the areas of economic and foreign policy, the federal government has a limited ability to change the culture of America


So the race will move on to New Hampshire. Mitt Romney is now grievously wounded. Romney represents what’s left of Republicanism 1.0. Huckabee and McCain represent half-formed iterations of Republicanism 2.0. My guess is Republicans will now swing behind McCain in order to stop Mike.


Huckabee probably won’t be the nominee, but starting last night in Iowa, an evangelical began the Republican Reformation.


Note: Due to technical problems (that are pretty funny), Brian is unable to post. So, he emailed the previous post to me and asked me to post it for him - Corey

5 comments:

watchman said...

Brian,

I'm glad you mentioned something I thought was very interesting. Both of the Iowa winners are populists. Or, at least, they sound like populists.

I welcome that.

Joey said...

I liked the fact that both are populists as well. The only thing I don't like about that is that Obama would beat Huckabee. Of all of the Democrats, I'd rather see Obama win than anyone else. But, I really don't like universal health care and a number of other things he stands for.

I'd like to see Huckabee vs. Clinton. Clinton wouldn't have a chance.

Great analysis Brian. Always good to read your posts.

Mike said...

Some good analysis here. There are a lot of ways to parse this further but in a nutshell I believe this: The only Republicans that I think can beat any Democrat put up are Romney and Giuliani, as much as I might like Mike Huckabee. These are the only three Republicans that will still be standing by Super Tuesday.

Hillary and Obama both scare the devil out of me. They represent wholesale change which I believe will be to the detriment of the country. We do not need a complete change of course in this country; we just need a little tweaking here and there. In general, this country works--and works quite well.

Joey said...

I disagree with Mike on this one. Huckabee has a better shot at winning the general than Giuliani does. After watching them in debates and on the campaign trail lately, Giuliani has so many skeletons in his closet and does such a poor job of speaking effectively that I don't think he has a shot in the general election. It also doesn't help that he looks older and more decrepit every day.

Huckabee is interactive and engaging. His Achilles' heel is that he's a former minister, which will give him the stigma of being just another pandering religious right crony. I think the more America is actually exposed to him, the more they'll see that this is not a fair description of him.

Romney doesn't have a shot at the general either. He personifies rich America unlike any other candidate on either side and comes across as completely out of touch with "regular" America. That's not to mention the skeletons he has in his closet and his multiple flip-flops.

I really think Huckabee is the only viable general election candidate out of the remaining three viable Republican candidates. I have absolutely no intention of voting for Mitt Romney if he wins the primary and you would be hard-pressed to get me to vote for Giuliani.

On the Democratic side, I hope Hillary wins because I don't think she would stand a chance against Huckabee. History has shown that party identification means little in the presidential election. People often really do vote for the individual for president, even if they tend to vote for the party at the state legislative level. Hillary is so disgusting to most Americans that I just really can't see her making it to the White House.

Okay, I'm done. I've had my pundit moment for the day.

Mike said...

Joey,

Some good comments. I think you are right in that the steam is quickly going out of Giuliani. But I think Huckabee is a big turn off to the liberal contingent who would never vote for him, just as you and I would never vote for Hillary.

Speaking of Hillary, she has more of a following than you and I can imagine---if you're like me, there is no one in my circle of acquaintances that has an ounce of use for Hillary (which means that we live in pretty tight circles). But Hillary has a great many admirers, and she has the Clinton machine behind her. I would never count her out against any Republican.

I don't know where this election is going. It is as wide open as I've ever seen since the first election that I voted in way back in '76 (I was a Ford man, by the way).